|
by Jerry Roberts
May 31 , 2003
I've grown so accustomed to avoiding
movies about the post apocalyptic future in which mankind has been wiped
out by ferocious *Fill In The Blank* that I find myself turning my nose
up almost as a reflex. I know the material, the formula, the characters,
the outcome but what I don't know is why, in these movies, the world has
been ravaged beyond the human need for fingernail clippers and a bar of
soap.
Reign of Fire is no different, other then some interesting special
effects to make legions of dragons fill the sky. I knew the movie's originality
level right off the bat when the bedtime story told to the kids was Star
Wars (Be wary of a movie so bankrupt of ideas that it has to reference
a better one).
The movie takes place about twenty years from now after a tunnel beneath
London breaks open an underground cave filled with dormant dragons. Mankind
fights back but find a snag in their efforts because every time they pump
a dragon full of lead, 100 more take its place. That leaves the handful
of remaining humans to cower in caves and await the inevitable. Not death,
but the arrival of one of those stock characters who chomps cigar butts,
packs a big gun, looks good in silhouette and has a stupid name.
His name is Van Zan (see, stupid name) and he's a take-charge kind of
guy who takes charge because that's what guys named Van Zan do. He pronounces
himself a Dragon Slayer and he has a theory that the people should rise
to the surface with six guns blazing and face the dragons head on, never
mind that that's how mankind got in this mess in the first place. The
leader of the people, Quinn (Christian Bale), is wary because he is positive
that the dragons will follow them back home and destroy them. With those
two idiotic assumptions the two men spend a good chunk of the movie at
each other's throats.
Alex (Izabella Scorupco) the movie's token female is actually the one
character whose vocabulary isn't limited to "Lock" and "Load".
She's obviously a scientist who tries to get these testosterone junkies
to cool down for a moment so they can figure out a plan. It doesn't work.
She's presented as a semi-intelligent character but surprisingly all the
bright ideas are brought up by Van Zan who doesn't look smart enough to
operate drinking fountain.
He hypothesizes that there is only one male dragon left on earth and that
dragons reproduce like fish whereas it only take one male to fertizalize
the eggs of tens of thousands of females. Where are all the other male
dragons. Well, if you expand on Van Zan's idiotic theory then you would
have to surmise that the females have added a sense of female empowerment
to their natural instincts and killed off all the males.
If that sounds silly then consider the other flaw in his Bachlor Dragon
Theory whereas he believes that if you kill the male then the population
will shrink. The Problem: There are tens of millions of female dragons
still in the skies and all are filled with hundreds of eggs. But the movie
figures that out as well in a bizarre scene in which the females cease
fire (no pun intended) and stop attacking once Quinn and Van Zan eliminate
the mister. Why? I guess when female empowerment is all that the dragons
have left, there's nowhere to go but down.
Van Zan may be great at explaining his half-witted theories (which are
written for those who take them as face value and don't consider them
for another moment) but as a military strategist he needs to go back to
boot camp. He hits upon the notion that dragons breath fire because they
secrete what he calls "natural napalm" in their mouths (yeah,
I know) and figures that throwing gasoline into their mouths will blow
them up. How do you toss a can of gas into a dragon's mouth? You'll love
this. He gets his men to hurl themselves at the dragons and toss in the
gas bombs! Setting aside the questions about the physiology of "natural
napalm" I was quite distracted by trying to imagine how one selects
volunteers to hurl themselves at a fire-breathing dragon. What's more?
How do you practice for something like that? |