Raiders of the Lost Ark

by Jerry Roberts

If you look deep into the origins of Steven Spielberg's work and you can probably find a personal agenda creeping into the sides of even his least works. Raiders of the Lost Ark isn't one of his lesser films but one might be inclined to think it is his most shallow. I don't believe that's true, because beneath his bone-jangling action scenes and snappy wit there is a level of dark urgency. When this film is mentioned there are usually a lot of knowing smiles and no one doubts that it's fun but an in-depth discussion is a rare thing.

In a way I understand why. Raiders can be an easy to write-off as a cheesecake action movie, a lark that Spielberg dreamed up between two of his more important films, Close Encounters and E.T. I think the film is just as deep, where E.T. was Spielberg's personal observation about divorce and Close Encounters displayed his desire to not be alone, Raiders taps into a childhood love of Saturday Matinee Serials and subconciously to his hatred of Nazis.

I think that the movie is far more intelligent than most give it credit for. This is one of the most well-paced action movies I can remember. It takes it time to build a story we care about, unlike most Hollywood product that seems to be playing Beat the Clock with the audience's presumed case of attention deficit disorder.

The first hour of the film is a build up long before we see the Ark. That time contains the search for the artifact to find the artifact, a gold medallion of which the bad guys only have a diagram. Most movies spend five minutes of discussion time before the movie's prize is found (witness Stargate in which the hero walked in and wrote the solution on a blackboard in the first five minutes). I rarely see a movie in which the director is willing to devote this much build-up.

I am relieved the see a hero who is intelligent and fallible. Indiana Jones, a professor who moonlights as an adventuring archaeologist digging in caves for lost artifacts (or is it the other way around?). Casting is important here because the role needed to go to a likable guy who can take it on the chin and make us believe that he isn't the center of the action but is just a witness to it as the bullets whiz by his ears. Harrison Ford broke away from Han Solo by playing a man who is a bit more mature and worn-down. The movie introduces Indiana as a college professor and he is allowed to think rather than just act as the token for action sequences, even though he gets into more scrapes than any action hero that I can think of. He gets punched, beaten, shot, burned, dragged and clipped on the jaw. He is nearly crushed by a boulder, skewered with arrows, bitten by snakes, blown up, hacked by a propeller, crushed between two cars and nearly falls to his death while hanging by his fingernails over a bottomless pit.

For me the movie fulfills two requirements: First, It has action scenes that mean something and don't feel tacked on and when it's over I feel that something has been accomplished. Of course this movie is all in the journey. Consider how Spielberg allows the movie to jump from one grandiose action sequence to the next. Beginning with the scene in which Indy is down in the Well of Souls surrounded by snakes follows with a mummy attack, a fight on a Nazi Flying Wing and the famous truck chase, the movie does not take a breath between these scenes.

My second requirement is that the movie have something at stake. For that, the movie has Indiana chasing The Ark of the Covenant before the Nazi's can get their hands on it. We are told with some dread that "An army, which carries the ark before it, is invincible". Most of the audience shares a hatred of Nazis and acknowledge how devastating their role in the world would become. This makes them easy to cast as villains. What is at stake in Raiders is far more important than most people recognize: The Nazi are trying to get their hands on the most valuable Jewish artifact. If Hitler possess it then he will not only rule the world but he will possess the soul and history of the Jewish people.

The Ark is portrayed in this movie as an object surrounded by death. Through the dialogue, Spielberg creates a grim tone around this object so we always know how dangerous it really is. From the moment that the movie calls the Ark into question we are told "The bible speaks of The Ark leveling mountains" and "Death has always surrounded it". In fact, when we see the Ark it is surrounded by motifs of death: snakes, rats, fire and Nazis. There is a scene in which it sits in a cargo hold in a crate embossed with the swastika and from the inside it burns the symbol on the outside. All of this more or less prepares us for what for ultimately happens when the Ark is opened and the spirits punish the Nazis for their blasphamy. There is a level of gruesome joy with which Spielberg and George Lucas dispatch the villains, not simply by killing but by an agonizing, horrible death.

This is where Raiders taps into Spielberg's hatred of Nazis and his childhood having heard stories of the holocaust. We've seen Schindler's List, we know how he feels about The Holocaust and about the Nazis role in the world. Knowing this is an action movie he allows them to be portrayed as very shallow, one dimentional. We see Dietrich, boot-lackey of Hitler who at one point addresses "Only our mission for the fueher matters" and stays focused on his mission to get The Ark back to Berlin. And there is the black coated Nazi Gestapo officer who all but smacks his lips as he tortures the heroine. The major villain however has a bit more character. His name is Rene Belloq, a French archaeologist and Indy's chief rival. He is older and has more connections to his goals then Indy.

But as much depth as Raiders has, I must observe that the movie is just plain fun. There are action sequences here that have never been surpassed even a quarter of a century later. Spielberg was smart enough to know what action movies are suppose to be, how they are suppose to be made and what we enjoy from them.